Ava Cordero was 16 when Jeffrey Epstein sexually assaulted her. When she came forward in 2007, the NY Post outed her, mocked her identity, and called her a liar. Newly released DOJ files reveal what happened next.
A list of anti-transgender donors obtained by the Bash Back activist collective was deemed so damaging to the anti-transgender movement
The "Independent" Review's own findings don't support the restrictions it's being used
“She has a PhD in mathematics, but does not have any formal education or qualifications even in biology, let alone in gender, sex or law" "She is not an expert at all".
The Australian Federal Court called into question the expertise of UK-based TERF activist Helen Joyce in a significant judgment handed down on Friday. Joyce, a prominent figure in the UK anti-transgender movement and enjoyer of Harry Potter erotic fanfiction, was called upon by Sall Grover (Giggle for Girls) to provide expert evidence in the case of Tickle v. Giggle for Girls.
The case centred on whether excluding transgender women from sex-based services violated the Sex Discrimination Act of 1984. A Report by Helen Joyce was presented to assist in arguing that transgender women should not be considered women for the purposes of the Act.
However, the court quickly identified significant issues with her qualifications.
“She has a PhD in mathematics, but does not have any formal education or qualifications even in biology, let alone in gender, sex or law, being the topics which her report addresses. [..] she is not an expert at all. She has no recognised expertise in any of the areas in which she expresses an opinion” the Judgement reads.
Thanks for reading Lucy From Naarm! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.
The court found Joyce’s submission was not based on scientific or legal expertise but rather on a personal and ideological commitment against recognizing transgender identities. As a result, her report was not accepted as expert evidence but rather as a mere submission, which held no substantiative value to the court's deliberations.
Ultimately, the court ruled in favour of Roxy Tickle, finding that she had been unlawfully discriminated against based on her gender identity. The court awarded Tickle $10,000 in damages plus costs. Joyce’s report, which sought to undermine the legitimacy of transgender women’s identities, was deemed irrelevant and unhelpful to the case.
The court case was significant in Australia, as it reaffirms transgender people’s right to be free from discrimination.
Thanks for reading Lucy From Naarm! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.
The attempt failed, with the coroner recommending funding to reduce the public waiting times for trans care & training for GPs wishing to provide care.
These recommendations are promising, and reflect a hope that healthcare access for transgender people can be improved, particularly within the public system.
A missing person report for Bridget, who had affirmed her gender, was filed by Police under her former name with an outdated photo from LEAP, failing to reflect her true identity.
The youth are calling for the draft guidance on gender-questioning children to be dropped and replaced with more compassionate guidance in line with their basic human rights.
Subscribe for free and get the latest from Lucy and others straight to your inbox.
